The scope is genuinely well-defined
Both sides can write what “done” looks like at signature.
Fixed-price · locked scope
From an $8K cross-platform MVP to a $150K complex enterprise build. Scope locked at signature, fixed timeline, weekly demos, written change-control. No silent scope creep. No “we underscoped, please send more money” in week 6. Senior team, NDA in 4 hours, 14-day onboarding.
Fixed-price mobile app development from $8K cross-platform MVP up to $150K complex enterprise build. Scope, timeline and price signed alongside the MSA; any change after signature is a written change order at the published rate card. No silent scope creep. We’ll tell you honestly when Time & Materials fits better.
The honest version
The phrase has been hollowed out by agencies that quote a fixed price, then negotiate the scope down or the change orders up until the project is over budget anyway. Our version is tighter — five things signed alongside the MSA.
The scope statement (specific screens, features, integrations, platforms — a list, not a paragraph of intent). The timeline (weeks, milestone dates, submission window). The price (no “approximately,” no “starting from”). Any change after signature is a written change order at the team’s rate, agreed before work happens. Acceptance criteria are written, not assumed — the final gate is store submission.
If those five things aren’t in writing, it isn’t a fixed-price engagement. It’s a Time-and-Materials engagement with optimistic forecasting.
The fit
Honest about the trade-off. Fixed price fits when scope is defensible and predictability matters; it doesn’t when you’re still learning what the product should be.
Both sides can write what “done” looks like at signature.
Procurement, board reporting or fund-raising timelines need a number that does not move.
App Store submission, a specific user journey working end-to-end, or a specific KPI threshold met.
Investor demo, trade-show launch, or a regulatory deadline.
You expect a handful of change orders, not a continuous stream of new features (that’s Monthly/Quarterly territory).
Plain numbers
| Project band | Scope | eCorpIT fixed price | US agency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple MVP | 5–7 screens, single platform, BaaS | $8K – $12K | $30K – $50K |
| Standard MVP | 8–12 screens, custom backend, payments | $15K – $25K | $60K – $100K |
| Mid-complexity app | 12–18 screens, multi-role, real-time/offline | $30K – $60K | $100K – $180K |
| Complex multi-role | 20+ screens, advanced backend, integrations | $60K – $100K | $180K – $280K |
| Enterprise build | Multi-tenant, AI, compliance overlay | $100K – $150K | $280K – $450K |
Same hours, same senior engineer profile, same shipped app — the 60–70% arbitrage is rate-card driven. We price fixed-price with a 10–15% risk premium over the same scope on Monthly; for predictable scopes the premium is worth it.
How it works
The honest version of how change orders work. Most fixed-price engagements run 2–6 over the project lifetime — the discipline keeps the conversation explicit instead of letting silent scope creep eat the margin.
Email, Slack, ticket — any channel. We acknowledge within one working day.
Within 48 working hours: a written change order with what it is, how many hours it adds, what it costs at the team’s blended rate, what milestone date moves, and what it knocks out (if anything).
No work happens on the change until the change order is signed.
The change becomes part of the scope. Future demos include it; the milestone plan updates.
The Friday status note lists open and closed change orders, hours consumed and budget impact.
No surprises
The line items most agencies break out as separate quote items are baked in.
Not included unless quoted separately: Apple Developer Program ($99/year), Google Play Console (one-time $25), AI/ML model training, large-scale backend rewrites, and paid third-party SDK licences are quoted separately.
The honest read
We don’t pretend fixed price is right for every engagement. Five situations where Hourly or Monthly works better — we’ll recommend it even when fixed-price is the more profitable sell.
When the goal is to learn what users want before defining the spec.
When investor or market feedback changes direction. T&M absorbs the pivot; fixed-price triggers a change-order conversation that may be larger than the contract.
Monthly is the right shape for “we shipped the MVP, now we’re figuring out v2.”
Hourly fits unpredictable-volume work — bug fixes, OS updates, security patches.
Training, evaluation and model iteration rarely have the certainty fixed price assumes. Monthly or Hourly fits better.
Standard payment schedule: 30% on signature, 30% at midpoint milestone, 30% at code-complete, 10% on store submission. Other schedules available on negotiation. Named references: GBFR and Reagan Medical Center, under NDA.
Procurement-ready
Start the conversation
Send your brief and a senior architect replies within 24 working hours with a recommended scope, indicative cost and timeline. NDA before any technical conversation.
Answers, up front
Fixed-price means a locked scope, fixed timeline and fixed cost agreed before work starts, with eCorpIT owning the milestones and acceptance criteria. It is best when the spec is well-defined and you want budget certainty; for evolving products, a dedicated-pod or monthly model usually fits better.
Fixed-price suits a clear, stable spec and predictable budgets. Time-and-materials suits discovery, changing requirements and ongoing product work. eCorpIT offers both and will tell you on the discovery call which genuinely fits — over-fixing an unclear scope usually costs more in change requests.
A fixed-price MVP starts around $8K cross-platform ($10K iOS-only); standard apps scale from there by scope. Because eCorpIT bills senior engineers at $22–$58/hour, fixed quotes run 60–70% below US-agency equivalents for the same deliverable.
FAQ
What teams ask before starting a fixed-price engagement.
Free project estimate · 24 hours
Within 24 working hours, you receive a one-page PDF: recommended scope, suggested tech approach, indicative pricing range, and a delivery timeline. Reviewed by a senior architect from the eCorpIT team. No sales pressure, no follow-up unless you ask for one.
Request received
A senior architect will review your brief and reply by email with a one-page strategy doc, indicative pricing, and a realistic timeline.
Reference — · We'll reply from contact@ecorpit.com.
Keep reading
Send the brief — NDA back inside 4 hours, formal estimate within 24 working hours of the discovery call. Manu joins every new engagement personally.